Anticoagulants for the treatment of isolated lower limb superficial vein thrombosis a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Anticoagulants for the treatment of isolated lower limb superficial vein thrombosis a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Alkis Bontinis a), Ioanna Pouliopoulou b), Vangelis Bontinis a), Vassilios Liakopoulos b, Argirios Giannopoulos a), Theodora Chatzimpalasi c), Kiriakos Ktenidis a)

a-Department of Vascular Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
b-2nd Department of Nephrology, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
c-School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Objective

Assess the safety and efficacy of anticoagulants in treating isolated superficial vein thrombosis (iSVT).

Materials and methods

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating anticoagulants in the treatment of iSVT. The primary endpoint of thrombotic complications encompassed any incident of iSVT progression/recurrence and the development of new-onset (deep vein thrombosis) DVT or (pulmonary embolism) PE.

Results

Eight RCT’s and 4721 patients treated once daily with either fondaparinux 2.5 mg, rivaroxaban 10 mg, therapeutic, intermediate, and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMW) were included. While all anticoagulants displayed a statistically significant risk reduction compared to placebo in terms of thrombotic complications and iSVT progression/recurrence, only fondaparinux reduced the risk for DVT/PE. Additionally, fondaparinux exhibited enhanced efficacy in decreasing DVT/PE events relative to prophylactic and therapeutic LMWH. Furthermore, rivaroxaban and fondaparinux demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of preventing thrombotic complications compared to all three dosing regimens of LMWH without significant differences between the two, risk ratio RR 1.00(95%CI:0.51–1.92). SUCRA identified fondaparinux as the most effective treatment regarding thrombotic complications, (SUCRA,91.6) and DVT/PE, (SUCRA,96) and rivaroxaban in terms of iSVT progression/recurrence (SUCRA,94.68). Ultimately and despite certain model limitations, meta-regression analysis suggested a possible trend towards improved outcomes with longer treatment durations for thrombotic complications β = −0.34(95%CI:-16.39to12.23).

Conclusions

Despite inherent limitations such as variations in treatment durations and follow-up periods, this review displayed the efficacy of fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and LMWH in treating iSVT. The improved efficacy of fondaparinux over therapeutic LMWH in terms of DVT/PE outcomes necessitates cautious interpretation underscoring the need for further investigation through adequately powered RCTs.